by Richard » 18 Apr 2020 05:59
Ong makes a good point here, implying that whether something counts as an error or not depends on the standard you're judging it against. Issues like S/V agreement, 'get to home' are only errors when judged against a very strict native speaker standard (this is one of the key points made by English as a Lingua Franca advocates).
When Ong judges based on intelligibility, he identifies no errors. I agree that the whole text is easily understandable, but should something be judged as an error when 1. it is definitively wrong; or 2. when it could be improved. For example, while not explicitly wrong, starting every very short sentence with the same subject (He, He, He) sounds childish and inarticulate, and is a point that could be easily improved. Even if we're judging the text against ELF norms, could this repetition be considered an error?